"snake..."
Just gnabbed this quote off some poor nameless sole's blog:
"If we live only for tomorrow, we'll have a lot of empty yesterdays today." - Thomas S. Monson
My thoughts expressed... nothing more, nothing less.
"Finding my way in a Dark Night of the Soul since 2005."
Well, just finished up reading "Twilight of the Idols" by Friedrich Nietzsche. If you've never read his stuff, let me just say that its not an easy read. Originally written in German, Nietzsche's works also contain French, Latin, Spanish, Greek, and English. To make matters worse, he often uses puns and parodies that demand an understanding of the original language. Because of this, the book that I read came with a section (equal in length as the work itself) labeled, 'Exlanatory Notes.' Several times in each paragraph, I was referred to the back of the book for explanation of a phrase that Nietzsche was using to make a statement. Nietzsche doesn't pull punches, and he uses his words with intense purpose to challenge the "old" ways of thinking.
Regarding his purpose, Nietzsche writes, "my ambition is to say in ten sentences what everyone else says in a book -- what everyone else does not say in a book...". Regarding Twilight of the Idols he writes, "in plain words: the old truth is coming to an end..."
Here are a couple of quotes from his writings and my thoughts.
Be warned this is a LONG post. For those who care, you should know that I think Nietzsche had a bitchin' cool mustache (I've started growing one like it today!), and somewhere in my ramblings here I refer to him as the Eminem of the 1800's.
Want to know what I'm reading now or whats next on the list? There is a section in the right-hand column towards the bottom.
Ok... carry on.
Let's see them thoughts!
"- I reduce a principle to a formula. Every naturalism in morality -that is, every healthy morality- is dominated by an instinct of life, some commandment of life is fulfilled by a determinate canon of "shalt" and "shalt not"; some inhibition and hostile element on the path of life is thus removed. Anti-natural morality-that is, almost every morality which has so far been taught, revered, and preached-turns, conversely, against the instincts of life: it is condemnation of these instincts, now secret, now outspoken and impudent. When it says, "God looks at the heart," it says No to both the lowest and the highest desires of life, and posits God as the enemy of life ... The saint in whom God delights is the ideal eunuch ... Life has come to an end where the "kingdom of God" begins ..."
As I read this stuff, it strikes me how much of what Nietzsche writes here is accurate. There really isn't too much that I see that is in conflict with the message of Christ. Now, don't get me wrong here. I know that later in his writings, Nietzsche goes on to call God bad and our human 'natural' desires healthy and good and thereby is in direct opposition to Christ. But the point *here* in this brief paragraph is really in alignment with what Jesus taught. The Bible teaches death to self, and here Nietzsche points that out. I mean, really, doesn't the "kingdom of God" really begin when life comes to an end? The call of death to the natural man, re-birth, and denial of self are repeated over and over in the Bible.
And Nietzsche's comment on God saying 'No to both the lowest and the highest desires of life' ... that is true as well. Christ called us to both repent (speaking to the 'lowest' desires of sinful selfishness) and to "hate" our fathers, mothers, and even our own selves (and the love for each of these certainly qualify in my mind as being among the 'highest' desires).
"The most general formula on which every religion and morality is founded is: "Do this and that, refrain from this and thatÂthen you will be happy! Otherwise ..." Every morality, every religion, is this imperative; I call it the great original sin of reason, the immortal unreason. In my mouth, this formula is changed into its opposite-first example of my "revaluation of all values": a well-turned-out human being, a "happy one," must perform certain actions and shrinks instinctively from other actions; he carries the order, which he represents physiologically, into his relations with other human beings and things. In a formula: his virtue is the effect of his happiness ... A long life, many descendants-these are not the wages of virtue: rather virtue itself is that slowing down of the metabolism which leads, among other things, also to a long life, many descendants ... The church and morality say: "A generation, a people, are destroyed by license and luxury." My recovered reason says: when a people approaches destruction, when it degenerates physiologically, then license and luxury follow from this (namely, the craving for ever stronger and more frequent stimulation, as every exhausted nature knows it). ... Every mistake in every sense is the effect of the degeneration of instinct, of the disintegration of the will: one could almost define what is bad in this way. All that is good is instinct-and hence easy, necessary, free."
This section starts off by talking about cause and effect. "Which came first... the chicken or the egg?" type of stuff. Nietzsche challenges the notion that virtue causes hapiness or that "license and luxury" cause the destruction of a people. I do wonder about this sorty of thing quite a bit. It is so easy to cite evidence of virtue by pointing to those who have found their way in life, or as Nietzsche puts it "a well-turned-out human being." And what of those who's life are not so well turned out, I often ask myself. Are they people so devoid of virtue? If we are going to cite one as evidence, we must also look at the other.
Towards the end of the paragraph, Nietzsche briefly touches on how he defines good and bad. Once again we have an odd thing. Christ promises that his "yoke is easy" and his "burden is light." And freedom is cited as one of the most wonderful benefits of faith in Christ. These are also cited by Nietzsche as critically necessary elements to true life. So both Nietzsche and Christ agree on some level. They both agree that these things are important and are evidence of good health and genuine life. But as to the source of this healthy and genuine life. Well, there we find a stark difference in their messages. Christ states with the authority of God that only upon death of self and rebirth in him is it possible. Nietzsche states (with all the boldness and moxy that he can muster up) that the exact opposite is true. Interesting stuff, ain't it?
"To derive something unknown from something familiar relieves, comforts, and satisfies, besides giving a feeling of power. With the unknown, one is confronted with danger, discomfort, and care,--the first instinct is to abolish these painful states. First principle: any explanation is better than none. Since at bottom it is merely a matter of wishing to be rid of oppressive representations, one is not too particular about the means of getting rid of them: the first representation that explains the unknown as familiar feels so good that one "considers it true." ... Thus one searches not only for some kind of explanation to serve as a cause, but for a selected and preferred kind of explanation-that which has most quickly and most frequently abolished the feeling of the strange, new, and hitherto unexperienced: the most habitual explanations.- Consequence: one kind of positing of causes predominates more and more, is concentrated into a system and finally emerges as dominant, that is, as simply precluding other causes and explanations.-- The banker immediately thinks of business," the Christian of "sin," and the girl of her love."Ah ... the depths of this thought process leads to dangerous territory of the mind! But I must confess that I have had the same thoughts as these! Are we just fooling ourselves? Accepting the most comforting of messages that we find? ...
"We no longer have sufficiently high esteem for ourselves when we communicate. Our true experiences are not at all garrulous [tiresomely talkative]. They could not communicate themselves even if they tried: they lack the right words. We have already gone beyond whatever we have words for. In all talk there is a grain of contempt. Language, it seems, was invented only for what is average, medium, communicable. By speaking the speaker immediately vulgarizes himself. -- Out of a morality for deaf-mutes and other philosophers."
This little paragraph is not nearly as critical to the effort of understanding Nietzsche's world perspective. Still, I found it to be very accurate. Sometimes I feel like the moment that I try to put a thought or a feeling to words, the actual thing that I am trying to say escapes in to the vagueties of the words I use. You see ... there I go again!
"Where faith is needed.-- Nothing is rarer among moralists and saints than honesty; perhaps they say the contrary, perhaps they even believe it. For when a faith is more useful, more effective, and more persuasive than conscious hypocrisy, then hypocrisy soon turns instinctively into innocence: first principle for the understanding of great saints. The philosophers are merely another kind of saint, and their whole craft is such that they admit only certain truths: namely those for the sake of which their craft is accorded public sanction- in Kantian terms, truths of practical reason. They know what they must prove; in this they are practical. They recognize each other by their agreement about "the truths."-- "Thou shalt not lie"--in other words, beware, my dear philosopher, of telling the truth ..."
I like how this paragraph ends, more than how it begins. Though I do love the line about how 'hypocrisy turns instinctively into innocence.'
The last part ... the warning ... oh I love that line. Some people, upon hearing the truth of the status of my heart and faith, have struck out at me with such aggression. It was as if my honesty somehow unnerved them. It got under the skin. And so they had no other way of dealing with me, no other tool in their belt, than to call me unfaithful... dishonest... a bringer of harm. Not too unlike the philosophers that Nietzsche refers to here who accept one another until one of them 'tells the truth' (that is to say, one of them speaks of anything but one of the 'accepted truths').
"Morality has always been a Procrustean bed."A what?! A Procrustean Bed ... thats what. (from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) A very thought provoking metaphor to me.
"Here the view is free.-- It may be nobility of the soul when a philosopher is silent, it may be love when he contradicts himself; and he who has knowledge maybe polite enough to lie. It has been said, not without delicacy: Il est indigne des grand coeurs de répandre le trouble qu'ils ressentent [It is unworthy of great hearts to pour out the disturbance they feel]. But one must add that not to be afraid of the most unworthy may also be greatness of soul. A woman who loves, sacrifices her honor; a knower who "loves" may perhaps sacrifice his humanity; a God who loved became a Jew ..."
Speaking to the point of this paragraph, I think of Yoda. He is the sort of great soul who has deemed in unworthy to pour out the disturbance he feels. ... And then I thought of ObiWan, who died protecting the Light Side. And I said, yeah... its true. There isn't just one way to be great in soul. Some are called to fight. And others, the wise sages, live on to tell the story to the next generation.
At first I found the last part of this quote from Nietzsche to be very perplexing. It was as if he was giving kudos to the God of the Bible, citing him as an example of 'greatness of soul.' But then, I remembered the very sarcastic, witty, playful sort of writer that Nietzsche is. I realized that in referring to Christ in this manner, he was *at best* putting Christ in the category of all the other pantheon of Greek gods and godesses... but more probably Neitzsche was twisting the dagger in to the minds of his readers, those who held some level of respect for Christ. You see, Nietzsche did stuff like that, just to screw with people. And he enjoyed it. He thought it was necessary to shake their world... and sometimes, as I read this, it seemed as thought he said things just for shock value. Like an Eminem of the late 1800's. (there it is, the comparison to Eminem, don't say I didn't warn you!)
"Goethe conceived a human being who would be strong, highly educated, skillful in all bodily matters, self-controlled, reverent toward himself, and who might dare to afford the whole range and wealth of naturalness, being strong enough for such freedom; the man of tolerance, not from weakness but from strength, because he knows how to use to his advantage even that from which the average nature would perish; the man for whom there is no longer anything that is forbidden, unless it be weakness, whether called vice or virtue ... Such a spirit who has become free stands amid the cosmos with a joyous and trusting fatalism, in the faith that only the particular is loathesome, and that all is redeemed and affirmed in the whole--he does not negate anymore ... Such a faith, however, is the highest of all possible faiths: I have baptized it with the name Dionysus."At the end of all of this, Nietzsche brings his thoughts to a fine point. He describes with almost heroic language his version of the "highest of all possible faiths." He also makes it painfully clear that his version is in direct conflict with the faith called for by Christ. And Dionysus? A Greek god borrowed from another people ... a god of many versions ... Nietzsche's version of Dionysus is a god of wine and raw instinct. You can read more here. Or more about the gnarly female followers of Dionysus, the Maenads, here.
On Dinoysus - "In Nietzsche's later philosophy the 'Dionysian' element of (intoxicated) affirmation comes increasingly to predominate in his thinking and self-perception: the Apollonian and Dionysan are no longer in tension but allied (the former being effectively subsumed by the latter, since both are now 'conceived as types of intoxication'), for Nietzsche now conceives the crucial opposition to be that between the Dionysian and the life-denying force of Christianity, as the final words of Ece Homo make clear: 'Have I been understood? -- Dionysus against the Crucified...'
Nietzsche applauds the natural man.
Christ calls for his death.
It can be said no more simply than that.
I will always remember December 31, 2005 as the night that I got my groove back. But already I am getting ahead of myself. Let me back up a bit.
The groove is back? Read more here...It must have been about seven or eight years ago that it all started. Or stopped as the case may be. Yes, that sounds about right... seven or eight years ago. But I didn't even realize that things had changed until more recently. The realization part must have happened about a year ago.
You see, I had become content to believe my excuses. After all, I did have grand mal seizures; was on medication even. And other times I was depressed. And then there were times when the setting wasn't quite right... or the sound system was weak... or the music selection stunk. The list went on and on. But at a certain point, I had to accept the facts:
I had forgotten how to dance.
"There are short-cuts to happiness,
and dancing is one of them."
~Vicki Baum
I remember my first couple of years out of high school. Back then, I loved to dance. Madonna hit it just about spot on with her song Into the Groove: "Music can be such a revelation / Dancing around you feel the sweet sensation / I hope this feeling never ends tonight / Only when I'm dancing can I feel this free." Yes, that is how it felt back in those days. The music provided a strange sort of revelation and the dancing, a sweet sensation. I loved it. I remember just letting loose as the pulsing bass beat pushed me around the darkened dance floor. Lights flashed brilliantly. Sounds of laughter came from my friends around me. We played silly little games with one another. Laughed at somebody's rendition of the RunningMan or CabbagePatch. I got psyched to hear Welcome to the Jungle come blaring out of the speakers so we could form an impromptu mosh pit. I would dance and groove until my entire body was completely saturated in sweat. Four hours after I had started, the legs would just give out on me. Though I never wanted to, for that night, I had to stop.
"Movement never lies. It is a barometer
telling the state of the soul's weather."
~Martha Graham
Is dancing something that you can forget how to do? Isn't it kind of like riding a bike or tying your shoes? Thats what I had always thought. Sure, it takes some time to learn, but once you get it, you get it for good. Well, it turns out I was wrong.
So how did I forget how to dance? I suppose 'forget' is probably not a very accurate depiction of what happened. No... I think it somehow became buried inside of me. It may have all started when I started having seizure activity one day at a friend's wedding back when the doctors still didn't have my medication nailed down yet and were testing different dosages on me. I didn't collapse into a full blown seizure or anything, but it was enough to make me get off the dance floor. The whole thing just pissed me off and put a real damper on my dancing mood for the entire night. At that time, my seizures had already robbed me of my driver's license, my ability to work, the ability to play sports, and the freedom to stay awake past midnight. Looking back, I believe that having this seizure activity while trying to dance was the straw that broke this camel's back and dug a grave in my heart where I would unknowingly bury my dancing spirit. Over the years I threw things on top of it that drove it deeper. Without even realizing it, I shoveled oppressive Depression and Inhibition on top of the grave, effectively all but destroying part of me that I really enjoyed.
"We're fools whether we dance or not,
so we might as well dance."
~Japanese Proverb
So I was danceless for quite a while. But not entirely. For when I was alone, I could let loose. In my car I would pump up the volume... sing/scream at the top of my lungs... and jive like there was no tomorrow. I was the lead singer, percussionist, and dancing audience at the same time (don't act like you don't do the same thing...). Something similar would happen when I was with my kids and my wife in the privacy of our own home. After a long day's work, my little boy would greet my at the door and say, "Daddy, play Ctn Eyd Jo!" ... and so I'd head to my computer and pull up Cotton Eyed Joe and I would take his little hand and body and dance with him until we both worked up a sweat. My wife would join us dancing around with my daughter Ella. It was fun. We were happy, all of us. I could completely let loose when I was alone and could do the same with my family. But why was I limited to that? Why did things become different when I was at a birthday party or a wedding reception?
I had become trapped in my head somehow. I really don't care to identify exactly what it was that trapped me. Maybe depression. Maybe an overly analytical mind. Maybe frustration with my seizure crap. I'm not sure. But when my wife took me to San Francisco for my most recent birthday, I told her on the way home that I was done being a prisoner. The next time I had the chance... I would dance, damn it.
I figured that if I can be a fool in private, then I should most certainly be able to be a fool in public.
"Socrates learned to dance when he was seventy because he felt that an essential part of himself had been neglected." ~Source Unknown
How to get my point across here. ... Have you ever laughed so hard that your whole body ached afterwards? I have. Maybe it has been a long time for you. Maybe it hasn't happened since grade school. Or maybe you are lucky enough to have experienced that kind of laughter more recently. But imagine if you forgot how to laugh like that. Imagine that your mind, your inhibitions, your worries, your insecurities... imagine that those things had actually silenced the laughter in your life ... just choked it right out of you. Imagine being limited to only a courtesy chuckle. Or a cynic's smirk. What a woeful life that would be! And can't you just picture people you know who live like that? I sure can. What a horrible thing it must be... and many of them probably don't even have the slightest clue as to their condition! Life without the ability to have a genuine laugh just can't be much of a life at all.
In a similar manner, I had experienced the loss of what I believe to be a critical liberty. Not the liberty to laugh, but the liberty to dance. I put a quote up top regarding Socrates learning to dance at a late age because he realized he had neglected something his entire life. There really is something to be said for that. I believe that like laughter, dancing is healthy. I don't believe its just for some. I believe its for everyone. No rhythm you say? No problem. No moves? No problem. Trust me... I've got just about zilch-o in the RicoSuave department. But you know what? As far as I'm concerned, its not at all about the moves, its about the spirit. A horrible, offbeat dancer with two left feet who is out on the dance floor groovin' to the music with a zest for life gets a lot more out of the night than the guy sitting on the sidelines holding up the wall. Every single time.
Why?... *CLICHE PUKE ALERT* ... Because life is meant to be experienced. You can't experience life while you are sitting in a chair or holding up the wall thinking about life. You just have to L-I-V-E it!
So... all that to bring you up to speed on what occurred on New Year's Eve. I was determined to dance that night, or die trying. Well, death is a little much, ... but I was committed to the effort, even to the point of having seizures. Not joking. Ok, you obviously don't believe me... but I'm telling you the truth. It was totally within the realm of possibility that I could have totally seized up out there and fallen flat on my face. I would have gotten up and tried again. I was that determined.
"Dancing with the feet is one thing,
but dancing with the heart is another."
~Anonymous
I had tried to dig up my dancing spirit on several other occasions before this one. It never really worked. I could do the Conga Line or an occasionally slow dance with my wife. But I could never break out of my mental prison for long enough to get my groove on. Something clicked inside of me on New Year's Eve though...
I was trying to explain all of this to my wife and I think I came up with a great example. Do you know the intro to the TV show Friends? Well, in one part of the intro, all of the friends go running hand in hand and jump in to a big ol' fountain. They aren't wearing bathing suits. They don't have towels. And its in the middle of the night, so they have got to be absolutely freezing. But do you know why that little clip is in there? Its because all of us want to live like that. Deep down we do. We want to live life fully. Not foolishly, per se. But sometimes I think we just get so caught up in the details... in the specifics... in the cares and worries... that life just goes rushing past us. Then, the parts of us that are meant to be adventurous and risk taking end up being ignored and somehow morph us in to deviant, addictive, self-medicating fools who just rot away shaking our finger at those who are courageous enough to actually live how we only wish we could. We make them out to be insane just because we can't hear the music, or, I would argue, perhaps we just don't have the courage to get up and dance to it. Or is that just me?
I remember the day that I dedicated myself to dancing. If you want to know exactly what was in my mind, I just said to myself, "You know what, F(orget) it all. I'm just going to let it all hang out and let the chips fall where they may. I'm sick of the shackles of my mind. I'm gonna bust loose. If I have to become a blabbering drunk to get there... or fall flat on my face from a seizure... so be it. I refuse to live my life from the sidelines caught up in my head a prisoner to my own thoughts!"
And that night, New Year's Eve, it was funny. I had actually expected to get totally hammered. I envisioned drinking like five or six shots of Tequila to get my brain to turn off long enough for me to remember how to dance. But lo' and behold... the wedding reception served only wine. And I hate wine. But remember, I was dedicated. So I downed three or four glasses of champagne over the course of our nine course meal. Got a tiny buzz going, but nothing like what I was originally shooting for. By the time the dessert was served, the buzz was gone. Totally gone. And so I thought I was going to fall short again on my efforts to dance. I thought that I would once again end up going out on the dance floor for a song or two only to leave afterwards dejected that I couldn't find my inner rhythm. To make matters worse, one of my uncles came up to me right as the music and dancing started and began a soul wrenching conversation about this blog, my faith, and whether or not the Local Church is a cult. Now, I have no problem entering in to those types of conversations, and I think I would have actually really enjoyed talking with this uncle about it... but right before re-learning how to dance, a serious conversation like that has got to be one of the worst things possible. It would be like if you were going to try to have a nice care free night on the town and one of your parents call you to tell you they are having problems in their marriage, ya know?
So the cards were stacked against me. I told my uncle I had to go join my wife on the dance floor... but I stopped a few feet away from the floor and watched the crowd dance for a song or two. The complaints started mounting in my mind. The music was too quiet. And the bass? Don't get me started. And what kind of songs were these that the guy was playing? ... Excuse after excuse came up. But then I saw my wife dancing. The smile on her face. The freedom. The joy. And I became jealous. ... "F(orget) it all... I'm gonna dance!" ... and I went out on the dance floor.
"To dance is to be out of yourself.
Larger, more beautiful, more powerful."
~Agnes De Mille
I was just like a man who hasn't ridden a bike since he was a kid. I stumbled at first. Wobbled back and forth... but ultimately found what had been buried inside of me for so long. I danced, and jumped, and skipped... and probably looked like an idiot. But I don't care. I was dancing. I was free. I was sweating. I was laughing. I felt like a liberated man. Like the Berlin Wall had just fallen. Like I was running through a forest without getting tired. I felt sexy. I felt whole. Complete. And all of this... without a single thought in my head. I wasn't analyzing. I wasn't thinking. I was living. My groove was back. And I loved it.
"And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music."
~Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche
So why would I say that this is the most important post to date? Well, you have to realize that the point to the whole thing is not dancing, you know. Its like... a way of life, man (think hippy talk here).
Are you gittin' what I'm spittin'? This is about living life!
You see, I am convinced that many people are content to sit and watch as life passes them by. I had become one of these types in some areas. From personal experience I know that becoming a bystander to life is a tragic occurrence. ... "DEAD MAN WALKING!" ... Do you know what I mean? What regret we would live with should we lose the freedom and/or ability to do the things that our heart needs so desperately!
As I said earlier, I think dancing is a lot like laughter. Or love even. Everybody needs it. We won't all be Fred Astaires... but thats not the point. The point is to enjoy the liberty that we have. Fighting it, denying it, ... leaves us less alive than if we were to embrace it. If we refuse to dance, to laugh, to love, we become trapped. We become victims of our fears, or insecurities, or pride. We stop hearing the music.
But as for me, I'm done with that crap. The music is back baby. From now on, I choose to be a free man. I choose to laugh. I choose to dance. I choose to love. I choose to L-I-V-E. Heck, I may even jump in to a fountain the next time I see one.
WoOt! One OTHER thing, looks like I hit my end of the year goals ... just barely by the hair on my chinny-chin-chin... but I made it. That means a good bonus for me later in the year and a free three day trip sometime this summer. Cool beans.
Miroslav is happy at work today. Kickin' butt. Takin' names.
2) Rarely in the moment - Have you ever met somebody, even briefly, and you found them to be so amazingly present in the conversation that it stirred something inside of you? There is no cell phone ringing on their hip, no plans they are looking forward to that keep their mind preoccupied, and no idle talk of silly things like sports teams. I love those types of people. ... Well, up to this point, I've been sort of the exact opposite of that I guess. Maybe not ALL the time, but more often than I'd like to be. Most of the time, I've been 'looking forward to' something else, something bigger and better than you, or now, or here. Its a really lame way to live. Its demeaning to those around me, its selfish, and curiously ineffective at achieving any sort of pleasure or happiness! So enough of it already!
3) The Journey - And to what end am I chasing? Do I think I'll find some sort of eternal state of bliss? (Oh yeah... all those wonderfully happy millionaires. Its so obvious that money = peace of mind and joy. Bah.) No, from this point on I will remember some friends of mine who lived in a small trailer home with three children, on an income that was less than twenty percent of my own. The father worked all day (but not more than fourty hours per week) and the mom stayed at home tending to the kids. These friends are my age. In a very real way, their happiness and contentment with life far exceeded mine. And thats not to suggest that I'm never happy or that they are never sad... but I do need to remember that money is not what makes the difference. I want to learn to be content HERE, NOW, on THIS LEG of the journey. Even in this place of doubt and lack of faith that I am in. I am learning to embrace it. (evidence? well, Miroslav got his groove back on New Year's Eve... but more about that in another post)
When you bring those three things together, you find what I have been, but will no longer be: A man who is rarely satisfied with what he has. A man who is always looking away from the here and now hoping that whatever lies on the horizon will bring the next buzz because obviously this ain't cuttin' it. A man who is missing the joy of the journey because of his focus on some imaginary destination.
There is something else to all of this as well. Something less self centered. As I consider world tragedy and ponder what my role is to be in it, I have been hit right upside the head with the enormous amount of responsibility that my wealth brings with it. Surely more is to be expected from the "have's" than the "have-not's." As I consider the attrocities that are commited around the globe, even at the hour I write this silly blog... my mind goes back to the Holocaust. When I first learned about that part of history, I wondered, "Where was everybody? Where were all the good people?" They at least had the excuse of being ignorant. And then there were those that knew, but were unable to do anything to fight it... wether through poverty, or sickness, or physical distance. But what about me? Its a serious question that I don't have the answer for yet. But I do know what my first step is.
res·o·lu·tion